|
At the beginning of the 2005 legislative session last January,
The Business Council wrote to all members of the state Senate
and Assembly, listing what our member businesses had identified
as the critical jobs issues facing New York State. As the legislative
session unfolded, we monitored action on specific legislative
issues that were linked to
those priorities. Some of these bills would have helped New York's
job growth; others, we believe, would have hurt us. (For
a list of those bills and a description of each, click here.)
Each legislator's action (or non-action) on each of those issues
was then scored, in accordance with the scoring system explained
below. The total of all their scores was calculated, resulting
in scores for individual legislators ranging from a +20 to a -2.
Finally, each quintile of the range of potential votes was assigned a letter grade. The resulting grade for
each legislator was then marked:
- A = 14 or higher
- B = 7 to 13, inclusive
- C = 0 to 6, inclusive
- D = -1 to -7, inclusive
- F = -8 or lower
THE SCORING SYSTEM
An individual legislator's scores are based on votes (or no votes)
on issues of concern to The Business Council - with additional points
(both + and -) for legislators who take a leadership role for, or
against, pro-jobs priorities.
ON LEGISLATION SUPPORTED BY THE BUSINESS COUNCIL
- +1 point each for sponsorship, positive vote and "leadership"
in support of legislation supported by The Business Council; for
a maximum +3
- -1 point each for negative vote and "leadership" against legislation
supported by TBC; for a maximum -2
- 0 points each for non-sponsorship, non-vote, no leadership
- +2 bonus points for champion and lead sponsor of bills that
are approved by both houses
Example
+5 |
Sponsor, vote for and "champion" pro-business
legislation that passes both houses of the legislature. |
+3 |
Sponsor, vote for and "champion" pro-business legislation |
+2 |
Sponsor and vote for pro-business legislation |
+1 |
Vote for pro-business legislation |
0 |
No involvement, no vote |
-1 |
Vote against pro-business legislation |
-2 |
Vote and lead opposition against pro-business legislation |
ON LEGISLATION OPPOSED BY THE BUSINESS COUNCIL
- +1 point each for no vote or "leadership" in opposition to
legislation opposed by TBC; for a maximum +2
- -1 point each for sponsorship, yes vote and "leadership" in
support of legislation opposed by TBC; maximum of -3
- 0 points each for non-sponsorship, non-vote, no leadership
- - 2 additional points for champion and sponsor of anti-business
bills that are approved by both houses
Example
-5 |
Sponsor, vote for and "champion" anti-business
legislation that passes both houses of the legislature. |
-3 |
Sponsor, vote for and "champion" anti-business legislation. |
-2 |
Sponsor and vote for anti-business legislation |
-1 |
Vote for anti-business legislation |
0 |
No involvement, no vote |
+1 |
Vote against anti-business legislation |
+2 |
Vote and lead opposition against anti-business legislation |
VOTING DATA
The Business Council relied on publicly available sources, including
the Senate and Assembly web sites and the Legislative Bill Drafting
Commission's "Legislative Digest", for data on sponsorships
and cosponsorships. We obtained legislative voting records from
"Statewatch", a subscription-based legislative reporting
system, and from other sources within both houses of the state legislature.
"Leadership" points were assigned by Business Council
staff based on our direct experience in working with legislators
on these issues, with some additional input from representatives
of Business Council members companies.
In most instances, votes used in compiling our index scores were
floor votes. Where a bill moved out of its committee of original
jurisdiction, but failed to make it to a floor vote, the original
committee vote was used. In our 2005 index, committee votes were
used for: S.4961 (Senate Energy), S.5427 (Senate Labor), S.1410
(Senate Transportation), A.5865 (Assembly Energy), A.6286 (Assembly
Education), A.8669 (Assembly Labor). |